I want to come back to Freud’s first theory of primary narcissism elaborated from his
study on Schreber to his pivotal paper On Narcissism. Freud described primary
narcissism as a transitional phase between the autoerotic state of the libido in which
the child constructs fragmented objects after parts of its own body and the object-relation in which the child’s libido gets attached to external individuals. From this
viewpoint the first complete object the child constructs to satisfy its sexual drive is its
own ego. The ego is not understood as a unity that exists from birth but as the result
of an imaginary act. The aim of this paper is to argue that this model is an essential
conceptual moment, which challenges the notion of personal identity. In the first part I
would like to resituate Freud’s conception of the ego in a tradition of anti-Cartesian
thinkers who from Spinoza to Hume have undermined the notion of an ego
understood as a substance. I argue that in their quest for an alternative to a philosophy
of consciousness those thinkers have firmly combatted against any concepts of the
ego that could be observed through introspection. In the second part I want to describe
the psychoanalytic setting as a dramatisation of an ego that is not the receptacle of a
secret identity but an infantile object. Contrary to a common prejudice the analytical
framework would not be a device of inquiry for a secret identity but the place of an
encounter with one’s own infantile objects.
No comments:
Post a Comment